Bring on compulsory annuities, says Deloitte partnerBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | WEDNESDAY, 28 MAY 2014 12:40PMThe government should introduce compulsory deferred lifetime annuities as a way of insuring against longevity risk, Deloitte's lead superannuation advisory partner Russell Mason has said. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Ausbil shutters $27m long short fund
Ausbil Investment Management has shuttered its Long Short Focus Fund, with $27 million in funds under management (FUM).
Ageing dynamics require holistic retirement planning: La Trobe
As more Australians enter retirement, the phase increasingly resembles a "distinct" economic life cycle, making better retirement planning essential rather than just an opportunity for financial advisers.
Aware Super elevates data and AI with new promotions
Artificial intelligence (AI)and data analytics are becoming increasingly central to investment decision-making, with Aware Super reshaping its investment leadership to strengthen how technology informs portfolio strategy.
Challenger open to TAL takeover at a better price
Challenger will continue to engage with TAL Daiichi Life to get a better offer price, after it rejected the takeover bid earlier this week, stating the offer falls short of a level it could recommend to shareholders.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss.







I am afraid of the 'dead hand' of compulsion in this argument about 'longevity risk'.
It flows off the tongue so easily. What could be better? says Mr Mason. This would take the risk out of everything for people when they reach old age.
Mr Mason suggests that George Osborne is just a politician looking to be re-elected. What nonsense!
Governments should never be in this area. It is so short sighted to hitch on to the Government teat. Imagine the bureaucracy that would grow like 'topsy' in order to administer things. Imagine also the fees that 'experts' in this field could graft from the government in the name of 'compliance & etc...'
The economist,Mr Maddock is correct!, 'Why stick your money into something that gives you 3% return, which you might get back when you are 85?'.