Breaking Australia's love affair with the lump sumBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 29 JUL 2013 11:55AMAs the population ages, Australians will have to move away from lump sum super payments and towards income streams, a trend that will demand bold policy changes |
Editor's Choice
BT appoints new head of strategy
A former Allianz Retire+ executive has joined BT as the new head of strategy.
ASX sees trade volumes soar in May
ASX saw a substantial growth in trade volumes last month, despite continued lackluster movement in IPOs.
Otivo launches AI-powered financial advice
Otivo has launched a mobile app for Australians to access licensed advice powered by AI.
Munro expands access to climate focused fund
The Munro Global Growth Climate Leaders PIE Fund has been opened to retail investors in New Zealand.
Products
Featured Profile
David Woodall
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SUPERANNUATION
INSIGNIA FINANCIAL LTD
INSIGNIA FINANCIAL LTD
Facing his greatest test yet in metamorphosing MLC Super, Dave Woodall is adamant the juice will be worth the squeeze. Jamie Williamson writes.







What a load of rubbish by Pauline Vamos! The general population has had enough of Government interfering with superannuation and we don't want ASFA advocating more changes which will obviously benefit the super funds by trying to keep money in super and therefore contribute to their own bottom line.
With greater longevity than ever before, the consumption curve in the post retirement can seldom be smooth if the limpsums supersede the draw down. The biggest dent to pension is Inflation and unless the draw down is indexed, it makes very little sense to have the same. While one survives 25 years in retirement, the lumpsum would certainly not last, nor would the draw down at a 20 years old rate and hence the indexation is a must.
Everyone prefers to have 'a bird in hand rather than in bushes' and hence with no guarantee of indexed draw down and also of survival prefer the lump. Nevertheless, times have changed and with higher life expectancy at 60 for the current generation, the question is not longevity but 'Healthy Longevity' as most of the old age expenditure goes medical.