Better use of client information essential to adviser successBY LAURA MILLAN | THURSDAY, 31 JUL 2014 12:30PMFinancial advisers have more information about their clients than almost any other industry and they should be using it to improve their service, netwealth executive director Matt Heine said. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Is demand for active ETPs genuine beyond outlier conversions?
As the active exchange-traded product (ETP) market continues to grow, new Rainmaker Information research asks whether demand has genuinely improved or if it is underpinned by conversions from three investment managers delivering "three exceptional months of work"?
Schroders nabs Lazard's Australian portfolio manager
Aaron Binsted will join Schroders Australia in early November as a portfolio manager and analyst after 24 years at Lazard Asset Management.
IFM targets growth opportunities with new global office
IFM Investors has opened its first office in Singapore to capture growth opportunities in a region "under allocated" by institutional investors.
HNWIs demand outperforming, mission-driven endowment funds
High-net-worth investors' (HNWIs) increasing demand for philanthropy vehicles with robust governance, a clear mission and can outperform in equal measure is helping fuel the rise of endowment funds such as the Aspect Impact Fund.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile
Sarah Shaw
GLOBAL PORTFOLIO MANAGER
4D INFRASTRUCTURE
4D INFRASTRUCTURE
It wasn't confidence that prompted Sarah Shaw to walk away from established investment houses and co-found 4D Infrastructure in 2015. It was something she believes is far more important: courage.







This is completely absurd, the Corporations Act has been there for a long time and clearly states the obligations a financial adviser has to their clients and the procedures when recommending or switching products. Unauthorized transactions, switching into high risk products, misleading deceptive conduct and other fraudulent criminal activities can only happen when the procedures of the Corporations Act is not adhered to.
So the question remains, how do immoral and illegal conduct and known by the adviser at the time as dishonest conduct in relation to ordinary people occur?
Are we not missing the point here? People didn't lose money because the adviser didn't know their clients well enough......they knew very well that their clients were naive and trusting and used that to their financial advantage. The Corporations Act is already there, if the rules and laws were adhered to perhaps the financial damage to clients would have been substantially less. So who oversees these laws are being adhered to, and who enforces the Corporations Act and the laws?