Benchmarks stop us thinking: AXA IMBY BEN COLLINS | TUESDAY, 31 JUL 2012 11:45AMThe shock of the GFC, the impacts of the Euro crisis and moribund world capital markets ever since are forcing institutional investors to confront the reality that their traditional investments models aren't working, said AXA Investment Managers. |
Editor's Choice
Is demand for active ETPs genuine beyond outlier conversions?
As the active exchange-traded product (ETP) market continues to grow, new Rainmaker Information research asks whether demand has genuinely improved or if it is underpinned by conversions from three investment managers delivering "three exceptional months of work"?
Schroders nabs Lazard's Australian portfolio manager
Aaron Binsted will join Schroders Australia in early November as a portfolio manager and analyst after 24 years at Lazard Asset Management.
IFM targets growth opportunities with new global office
IFM Investors has opened its first office in Singapore to capture growth opportunities in a region "under allocated" by institutional investors.
HNWIs demand outperforming, mission-driven endowment funds
High-net-worth investors' (HNWIs) increasing demand for philanthropy vehicles with robust governance, a clear mission and can outperform in equal measure is helping fuel the rise of endowment funds such as the Aspect Impact Fund.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Sarah Shaw
GLOBAL PORTFOLIO MANAGER
4D INFRASTRUCTURE
4D INFRASTRUCTURE
It wasn't confidence that prompted Sarah Shaw to walk away from established investment houses and co-found 4D Infrastructure in 2015. It was something she believes is far more important: courage.
The Financial Standard podcast Tune in each week as we discuss the latest developments in Australia's wealth management industry. |  |
Often one of the products of smart-beta portfolios is the creation of blended benchmarks. There are some pretty substantial operational costs and risks associated with this new approach to benchmarking using blends and customised hedges. The choice of benchmark architecture should definitely not be an afterthought. Picture an example combining FSTE ASEAN EX-Singapore Hedged into SGD 50% blended with FSTE Singapore in SGD 50% assuming daily modelling? The issues dictated by who designs the rules of the blend, the calculation methodology, whether the creation of the new benchmark levels are calculated in-house or by a specialist provider, the availability of a license to calculate blended outcomes and general governance of business justification can all drive complexity, inefficiency and leave a difficult to foresee "event" risk. Now imagine scaling implementation and opps up to cope with systemic blending of benchmarks for trade management, compliance, risk and performance attribution in-house - one of the popular choices. However you measure the likelihood of an unfavourable event occurring regarding the blending, the impact of errors in a calculation may include paying out multi-year penalty fees and substantial reputational damage. RIMES recommends spending some time considering risk management and a review of externally available solutions to support blends and benchmark customisations.