Westpac weighs in on FoFA debateBY LAURA MILLAN | FRIDAY, 9 MAY 2014 11:25AMWestpac said that the government's proposed changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation are "necessary" to ensure consumer protection. Related News |
Editor's Choice
ASIC issues 'wake-up call' to trustees on member complaints
|The corporate regulator is calling on superannuation trustees to improve oversight of issues arising from member complaints, noting many are not doing enough to use complaints as early warning signs of broader issues.
Aware Super expands Challenger partnership for lifetime income solution
|Aware Super has moved to expand its retirement income offering through a partnership with annuity provider Challenger, as superannuation funds face growing pressure to help members turn accumulated savings into sustainable income.
FBI accuses North Korea of $9bn Binance crypto heist
|North Korea has been accused of being the culprit behind the $9 billion (US$6.3bn) cryptocurrency heist from global digital asset platform Binance that took place last week.
ASIC takes action on Falcon Capital directors
|ASIC is suing the directors of Falcon Capital, the responsible entity for the failed First Guardian Master Fund, alleging "serious and widespread failures" in their oversight.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







The only "high level of uncertainty" the removal of the catch-all requirement to act solely in the client's best interest is that created in the Bank's mind - not the consumers!
As to Westpac's proposition that the watering-down of the FoFA requirements is "necessary to ensure consumer protection", I'd only encourage the Senate Committee to jump on IView and watch what last Monday's Four Corners expose on the CBA's version of consumer protection.
Lets be clear, crystal clear. General advice from an untrained branch teller, remunerated by commission IS NOT 'advice' that any consumer wants or needs, regardless of how 'cheap' it appears to be.
The ability to sell all manner of financial products to the public, through staff even less qualified than the financial advisers (for which training and qualifications are already constant source of industry embarrassment). Pay them a commission to do so and then if anything goes wrong "oh, it was general advice only we are not responsible". Wow, practically a lotto win for financial institutions?
Anyone within the world of banking and finance understands this, therefore statements to the contrary are just conflicted interest nonsense. The only people making such statements..... surprise surprise are those who stand to profit from it. Every other bank has thus far had the smarts to keep their mouth shut and lobby in private, not so for Westpac it seems.