Editor's Choice
Actuaries Institute proposes new performance test measure
The Actuaries Institute has proposed revising the annual superannuation performance test, so it better aligns trustees' investments with the best financial interests of members.
JANA appoints new director of client development
The new appointment previously worked for APSEC Funds Management.
MSC Certane wins Suncorp mandate
MSC Certane has been appointed as trustee for Suncorp's latest note issue.
Auditors lambast mandatory climate reporting requirements
The peak accounting body said most auditors believe the government's mandatory reporting rules are a "significant miscalculation".
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
re the proposal to tax SMSF earnings at 15%, can we assume the same rate will apply to the earnings in pension phase of the Industry Funds? And why would the tax on realised capital gains be higher in Pension phase than in accumulation phase (at 10%).
Also why are franking credits so much more of an issue for SMSF than the other types of funds?
Are we serious about discriminating between funds, individuals etc as to who gets the benefit of the franking credit?