Super guarantee of 12pct a mistakeBY KERRIE SYDEE | TUESDAY, 4 OCT 2016 12:11PMAssuming that saving for retirement is synonymous with superannuation is a mistake according to the Grattan Institute. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Insignia gives PE firms more time to devise deal
Bain Capital and CC Capital Partners have been granted more time to thumb through Insignia Financial's books.
DII drives life insurance disputes: APRA
Disability income insurance (DII) continues to be a bugbear for the life insurance industry and is the most highly disputed product among advised, non-advised and group insurance customers, APRA statistics show.
Mantis to distribute new micro cap offering
Mantis Funds has secured a distribution deal with Balmoral Investors, taking its micro cap strategy to market.
Div 296 must proceed to strengthen 'fairness' in superannuation: ASFA
Ahead of the federal election, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has urged all contesting parties to consider its recommendations to "protect and strengthen" the super sector.
Products
Expert Feed
The gatekeeper fallacy: A critical analysis of financial advice regulation in Australia
The current regulatory framework for financial advice in Australia rests on a fundamental misconception that threatens both consumer protection and industry ...
How family shapes our financial futures
It doesn't take our 100+ years of collective wealth management experience to know that intergenerational wealth is a hard problem.
A tale of two conflicting PBRs
What happens if a spouse survives the death of the member but dies before payment has been made?
From red tape to results? DBFO's potential
With only around 15,480 financial advisers in the country at last count, and 800 Australians retiring every day, the profession is facing a severe shortage ...
Featured Profile
Paul Heath
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
KODA CAPITAL PTY LTD
KODA CAPITAL PTY LTD
Koda Capital chief executive and founding partner Paul Heath grew up a stone's throw from the company's chair Steve Tucker in Perth. Their eventual collaboration gave rise to one of Australia's premier independent wealth management firms. Andrew McKean writes.
The conclusions drawn by the Grattan Institute in its recently released report How Households Save for Retirement are flawed.
The report is based on the Grattan Institute's analysis of four retirement income pillars.
And several of these retirement pillars do not reflect the real world of how people save for their retirement
The Grattan Institute has included the value of a person's home, their house contents and their vehicles in their retirement income pillars.
There are not many people who can say their house, their house contents or their vehicles are going to give them an income when they retire. So in the real world, I do not see how you can count the value of these as part of someone's retirement income pillars.
The Grattan Institute also includes in a person's wealth, a theoretical calculation for the net present value of any future pension they may get, which the government of the day may not even be able to afford to pay.
So once you remove these so called retirement income pillars, superannuation becomes a significant part of what is left.
So to make a policy decisions based on the view that superannuation is currently the least important part of Australia's retirement income system, is fraught with danger.