States could learn from Baird's infrastructure model: ISNBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 24 JUN 2013 12:15PMThe New South Wales government's innovative infrastructure funding model will be in the interests of industry super funds, according to director of government relations at the Industry Super Network (ISN) Matthew Linden.
|
Editor's Choice
Actuaries Institute proposes new performance test measure
|The Actuaries Institute has proposed revising the annual superannuation performance test, so it better aligns trustees' investments with the best financial interests of members.
JANA appoints new director of client development
|The new appointment previously worked for APSEC Funds Management.
MSC Certane wins Suncorp mandate
|MSC Certane has been appointed as trustee for Suncorp's latest note issue.
Auditors lambast mandatory climate reporting requirements
|The peak accounting body said most auditors believe the government's mandatory reporting rules are a "significant miscalculation".
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
Read my letter to the AFR, 20/6/2013, page 47
Energy costs take a toll on roading charges
Treasurer Baird wants to fund the first stage of WestConnex from asset sales (equals taxpayer money) and then wait for traffic counts so that a publicly owned toll road company can issue bonds against toll revenue. Which toll revenue?
Estimates after stage one would be as risky because no one knows what the traffic would be in stage two, not to mention stage three.
Granted, the risk is spread over many years but there is a rub. As we are burning our finite oil reserves, the remaining oil is less productive to produce. A recent energy outlook of the US department of Energy estimated that US shale oil until 2040 - the timelines for a tollway - is the equivalent of just 10 months of global oil demand but require more than 200,000 wells. Syncrude from tar sands, oil from deep or even ultra-deep water and oil from maturing giant fields with horizontal wells and enhanced oil recovery, all cost a lot in input energy and money.
High oil prices reflect this situation. For an economy just to stay even, productivity in the use of oil would have to compensate for the loss in productivity to produce this oil.
Tollways dependent on a slow transition from gas-guzzlers to fuel efficient cars cannot neutralize the impact of a three to four-fold increase in oil prices. Only car-pooling can do that. But that would kill all tollway operators unless tolls are charged per passenger. Good luck.
Traffic projections of four road tunnels were embellished because planners did not do the above productivity calculations.
Instead, their models calculated that higher oil prices would be absorbed by a growing, general inflation and purchasing power index.
This has turned out to be an untested assumption. So there is no future for toll-ways