Editor's Choice
Actuaries Institute proposes new performance test measure
The Actuaries Institute has proposed revising the annual superannuation performance test, so it better aligns trustees' investments with the best financial interests of members.
JANA appoints new director of client development
The new appointment previously worked for APSEC Funds Management.
MSC Certane wins Suncorp mandate
MSC Certane has been appointed as trustee for Suncorp's latest note issue.
Auditors lambast mandatory climate reporting requirements
The peak accounting body said most auditors believe the government's mandatory reporting rules are a "significant miscalculation".
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
Whilst it might appear that banks are spending a 'fraction' of their budgets on superannuation advertising, they are able to leverage their existing brand advertising - and the research shows a sizeable spend for banks advertising generally. Banks also spend a lot on distribution through their branches, where they have targets to up sell other products including superannuation as well as referrals to their financial planners. How much of this process is allocated towards the superannuation spend, I wonder?
My comment is not a dig at how banks do business but I don't believe a comparison can be made that simply to the spend by industry funds.
It's common knowledge that funds lose members to the well known retail brands and their associated financial planning networks. Industry funds are still relatively young in the market and they need to be able to develop their brand, awareness and distribution strategies like any other business.
The scale defence looks a little pie in the sky when you consider Australian Super is about to increase insurance premiums by up to 75%.
Why does no one ask how the trustees/directors of industry super funds benefit from having more funds under advice and more members.
It would be pretty clear that these funds are not run only to profit members when their remuneration packages are exposed.