Industry, APRA mull super merger costsBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | THURSDAY, 17 SEP 2020 12:39PMSuperannuation industry stakeholders are in talks with the prudential regulator to devise a lower cost option for fund mergers, with smaller funds currently facing the potential of being priced out of merger opportunities. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Jo Townsend named chief executive of NZ Super
One of Australia's most experienced superannuation executives will take the helm of New Zealand's sovereign wealth fund, following Matt Whineray's departure late last year.
QMV Legal folds, managing partner to launch new firm
Novigi will wind up QMV Legal as its managing partner Jonathan Steffanoni embarks on launching a new specialist superannuation law firm.
Best super fund products revealed
The best superannuation fund products, based on factors such as investment performance, insurance, fees, and organisational strength, have been named.
Platinum bleeds $1.4bn in outflows
Platinum Investment Management flags it will lose at least $1.4 billion as a partial redemption from institutional clients over the next month, translating to an $18 million hit to revenue.
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
There are a couple of contributing factors. Firstly, most super funds, and especially small to medium size have poor data management which makes initial due diligence and then actual merging expensive. Some smaller funds may get "left on the shelf". Secondly, funds are merging one at a time. We haven't yet seen (I think) the "mega merge" with multiple (ie. more than 2) funds merging together at the same time. Admittedly this will be daunting to many but if economies of scale are a reason for merging, then there can be economies obtained in merging multiple instances at the same time.