Compulsory super detrimental: ResearchBY ELIZABETH MCARTHUR | WEDNESDAY, 29 MAY 2019 11:43AMCompulsory superannuation is detrimental to many people and a voluntary super system would provide greater benefit, according to new research.
Related News |
Editor's Choice
Actuaries Institute proposes new performance test measure
The Actuaries Institute has proposed revising the annual superannuation performance test, so it better aligns trustees' investments with the best financial interests of members.
JANA appoints new director of client development
The new appointment previously worked for APSEC Funds Management.
MSC Certane wins Suncorp mandate
MSC Certane has been appointed as trustee for Suncorp's latest note issue.
Auditors lambast mandatory climate reporting requirements
The peak accounting body said most auditors believe the government's mandatory reporting rules are a "significant miscalculation".
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
Given the abysmal penetration and management of superannuation in the years before the Hawke/Keating overhaul (I did a national survey of private and corporate super for Personal Investment magazine back in May 1985), this has got to be one of the most stupid pieces of economic research on record.
The article is right about one thing "correlation does not equal causation" not only in this case but in so many other instances.
Cochrane's comment is correct in that prior to the Hawke/ Keating overhaul Superannuation was normally only available to permanent employees ( after a qualifying period) of Federal/ State & local government departments /instrumentalities &large /medium corporations.
Small employers were unlikely to provide super & in most industries short term / casual employees were not even considered.
Company funded benefits were subject to vesting scales that started after 5-10 years membership so that on termination a member might only get their own contributions back with a small amount of compound interest. The benefit could be paid out at any age, was not subject to tax until 1 July 1983 & was usually taken in cash. There was no system in place for direct transfer to another fund.
Today SGC contributions are fully vested from day one, subject to preservation & the accumulation can be readily transferred to another fund.
Award Super only started in 1987at 3% , the SGC at 3% in 1992 - only rising to 9% by 2002 & to 9.5% in 2013.Even if the 9.5% had been payable over the 22 years the accumulation of 2.09 times the average salary paid would not provide a pension to live on.
It must be remembered that that if the 9.5% was paid as wages it would be subject to tax & the employee would only receive 7.7% (19%tax), 6.0% (39%tax) & 5.2% (45%tax).
Compulsory super was meant to be the long-term answer to offset the ever-increasing cost of the Age Pension, but ongoing political interference is not allowing it to achieve that objective.