Broaden ASIC banning powers: ReportBY KARREN VERGARA | THURSDAY, 7 SEP 2017 12:38PMThe corporate regulator could soon have increased power to ban "unfit" senior managers, directors and officers of financial services companies. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Oreana targets early education assets with new fund
Following its expanded footprint in Australia, the property development and investment firm has launched a new fund targeting early education properties for wholesale and institutional investors.
Splintered globalisation a boon for AI, metals, EVs: PGIM
As geopolitical tensions and trade wars derail globalisation, artificial intelligence (AI), metals and minerals, and electric vehicles (EV) are some of the sectors poised to be winners for investors, new research from PGIM shows.
Government plans to develop 'fit for purpose' digital asset regime
Treasurer Jim Chalmers and special envoy for cyber security and digital resilience Andrew Charlton have announced plans to develop a digital asset regime, aimed at providing clarity and certainty to the sector.
Australians 'overwhelmed' by retirement: Aware
New research has found 63% of Australians aged 45 and over are concerned or anxious about retirement.
Products
Featured Profile

Raamy Shahien
JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
VIRIDIAN ADVISORY PTY LTD
VIRIDIAN ADVISORY PTY LTD
Like most who are drawn to financial advice, Raamy Shahien is a people person, and it's his desire to foster a strong, sustainable community that has helped propel Viridian Advisory. Eliza Bavin writes.
ASIC definitely requires more authority and effectiveness, but this will only come when they also have more funding. Currently they are very understaffed due to underfunding and the lack of effectiveness contributes to the underfunding. For example there are many, many companies who should have AFSL Licenses but don't. Subsequently the govt. does not receive the license fees and THE CONSUMER DOES NOT GET THE PROTECTION THEY DESERVE. With the current new RG 126, the licensees for the very first time in Australia must abide by a minimum value of Professional Indemnity insurance cover required. With funding hopefully there would be some new systematic policing of licenses and consumer protection by way of adequate PI insurance cover.
This is even more critical with several hundred new companies wanting to participate in the Australian market. It should also be ringing alarm bells that many of the current mark participants who don't have the required license are currently listed on the ASX-how?
How are their shareholders protected?