AFA defends industry against Labor attackBY KARREN VERGARA | MONDAY, 21 JUN 2021 12:28PMThe Association of Financial Advisers has slammed the Labor Party's attack on financial advisers, which paints the profession as dodgy and continues to rip-off consumers.
Related News |
Editor's Choice
Adviser numbers plateau
The number of financial advisers in Australia appears to be stabilising at 15,602, as Count and AMP Financial Planning continue to hold the lion's share.
Praemium loses $700m due to adviser transitions
Praemium reported total net outfows from its Powerwrap scheme has reached $700 million over the past three quarters.
Small cap investors told to 'stop whinging'
Forager's chief investment officer has read the riot act to investors.
Adam Blumenthal ordered to pay $850k
Blumenthal is also banned from managing corporations for five years.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
I don't completely disagree with the parliamentarian's comments and as an adviser of almost 40 years, I have seen so much of what she referred to. No one says ALL advisers are shonky - like no one hates ALL lawyers - but enough are/do to make it fair comment. The problems that may arise need to be dealt with rather than ignored or worse, taken as personal insults.
Regulation must consider what may go wrong as well as what may go right - that's the whole point of regualtion. Jumping on every adverse comment without offering constructive criticism, or - better - a solution - is childish. That's one of the reasons I'm getting out of this business. I've not particularly enjoyed the company of far too many in it who've done little to enhance the status or the reputation of what should be a wonderful way to help people, but has been too exploitative for far too long.
The best antidote to unintended adverse comment is to take the air out of its sails - and ignore it. Good luck Philip (Carman) - a pity you're not staying on to help repair the damage to which Ms McAllister makes reference.