<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Paying women more super not the answer</title>
	<description>Senator Jenny McAllister believes many people don't feel comfortable with the idea of paying women more superannuation as a government response to fix the gender retirement savings gap.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=77696449</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:08:32 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:08:32 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Kevin Williamson (Retired)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou for highlighting the benefits of compound interest and the need to stay in the workforce.</p>
<p>I feel that I have been struggling to get people to understand that for men and women to each have an equal period in retirement (say 15 years) then a woman should retire at an age 2 years older than a man, using her longevity advantage to make up for any earlier years when she has not worked.</p>
<p>Those extra years of contributions and compound interest (on her higher pre-retirement balance) will compensate her, allowing each gender to use their similar super over a comparable retirement period.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Williamson (Retired)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:08:32 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>