<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Robots can't read your dreams, advice firm warns</title>
	<description>Robo-advice is potentially damaging for the advice sector, as it's hard to replace a human's ability to discuss a client's dreams and aspirations, an advice group has said.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=53533075</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:29 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:29 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by James Hockey (Magic Finance)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>So, the writer believes that &quot;People planning for retirement need to consider whether they are content with obtaining recommendations about their future based on mathematical formulas from a computer or whether they prefer an individualised, personal recommendation,&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;It's hard to replace having the ability to talk to someone face to face, discuss your dreams and aspirations and have someone recommend a personalised retirement plan that is specific to your needs.&quot;</p>
<p>So if you do not use mathematical formulas to create wealth, what do you use to create these formulae: a magic 8 ball?</p>
<p>Any adviser who does not embrace RoBo will be left out in the cold IMHO as personalize advice within the digital space is already here.</p>
<p>The game won't change, just the way it is interacted with and viewed - get on board while the ticket price is low I say.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>James Hockey (Magic Finance)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:29 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>