Financial Standard Comments - ISA urges government to keep super safety net

Comment by David S (n/a)

David S (n/a) — Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:14:09 +1000

The fact that it is referred to as a safety net is half the problem - it should be called what it is, red tape and an anti-competitive loophole.

Reply to article

For original story, Click Here.

Comment by R B (.)

R B (.) — Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:28:19 +1000

"More than eight million Australians don't choose their own super fund and rely on their employer to place them in a high performing fund. These funds are selected in a merit-based process overseen by the Fair Work Commission," said the ISA chief executive.

Are you kidding me? Under what basis are employers making judgement calls on "a high performing fund"? And under what basis is that employer responsible if the expectation on performance is not achieved?

Does this mean that employers are assuming that past performance is an indicator of future performance?

What a load of rubbish. It's all about the unions, nothing else.

Now, pardon me but I just have to get to my Corporate Box at the MCG tonight as a guest of an industry super fund ....run only to profit members don't forget.

Reply to article

For original story, Click Here.

Comment by Wayne Stark (Wealth Partners)

Wayne Stark (Wealth Partners) — Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:35:22 +1000

This regime is anti-competitive and not in the best interests of consumers. ISA has the attitude that "big brother knows best". ISA should have to compete in the open market and not be provided with a tied stream of members. Let's see how they perform when it is a level playing field.

Reply to article

For original story, Click Here.