<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Retail funds deny relying on passive investment</title>
	<description>Three major retail superannuation funds have rejected claims that they are relying on passive investment strategies to keep MySuper product costs down, confirming they have a significant allocation to active managers.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=44717210</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:42:27 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:42:27 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Chuck D (chucks super sleuths)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>GIven MySuper has only been around 10 months, the below statement I feel to be rather misleading:</p>
<p>&quot;Wholly indexed investment approaches embraced by the cheapest retail MySuper products have on average underperformed comparable Industry SuperFund balanced options on a net basis by 83 basis points per year over a ten year period.&quot;</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Chuck D (chucks super sleuths)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:42:27 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>