<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - AIA hybrid commission strategy pays off</title>
	<description>AIA Australia's initiative to reward advisers who move to a hybrid commission model has seen 829 advisers shifting to the new system in the past five months.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=42099550</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:00:10 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:00:10 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Big Daddy (in Wonderland)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>And ASIC is quite OK with instos behaving like this? .....i.e. upping the commissions to increase product sales. But in typical fashion, ASIC and clients (i.e. AIA policyholders) will blame it all on advisers if the product or the institution goes pearshaped, or knocks back more insurance claims than the industry average.</p>
<p>Wouldn't it be more proactive an approach to mandate identical commission structures across the entire life industry, so that there is no glaringly obvious incentive to recommend one product over a competitor's?</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Big Daddy (in Wonderland)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:00:10 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>