<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Third arrow, broken arrow</title>
	<description>Today's economic dynamics - before and after the consumption tax was raised from 5% to 8% -- are playing out almost as they did back in 1997.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=41349757</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:50:08 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:50:08 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Stu A (A)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi Ben, enjoy your articles. Do you know what strategies Japan is implementing to increase the birth rate? Baby bonus or something more subtle?</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Stu A (A)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:50:08 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Ben O (Financial Standard)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Thanks Stu,</p>
<p>This is exactly the point I'm trying to get across in this piece, that this approved &quot;growth strategy&quot; lacks details -- at least, none I found in various reports I've read to date.</p>
<p>Japan's ageing population is certainly a humungous problem as it could compound the country's problem with consumer spending.</p>
<p>I'll be sure to report on this if I find any details.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Ben O (Financial Standard)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:09:00 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>