<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Labor to oppose rise in pension age</title>
	<description>Opposition leader Bill Shorten has said Labor will not support the government's bill to lift the Age Pension eligibility age to 70.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=40229802</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:41:51 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:41:51 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by R B (.)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Who says they have to retire at age 70?</p>
<p>Retire whenever you want, just be self sufficient until you reach the age at which you start looking for handouts...</p>
<p>Do we all remember it was Rudd in 2009 that increased the pension age from 65 to 67...?? What was the media doing when that announcement was made?<br>
What was Shorten thinking when they did this?</p>
<p>And can we all remember who has made it harder to play catch-up when it comes to trying to get more into super and be self funded in retirement?</p>
<p>No mirrors in the Labor Cabinet rooms at all.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>R B (.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:41:51 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>