<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Research houses to blame for advice catastrophes: AIOFP</title>
	<description>The Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP) said that research houses' conflicts of interest when rating products are one of the reasons behind the failure of some funds.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=40033858</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 14:02:56 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 14:02:56 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Stephen Dingjan (Life Risk Partners)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>As a researcher our concerns about panels of researchers are how it might affect competition. There are very high barriers to entry now and a panel is another hurdle to jump before being able to compete for research contracts.</p>
<p>Quality of research requirements are necessary and perhaps a review of processes and methodology by an independent body might be more appropriate.</p>
<p>Other ideas such as where Licensees become shareholders of a researcher only whilst they use the research will help to align interests of researchers and advisers.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Dingjan (Life Risk Partners)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 14:02:56 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Bob Burns (Retired Financial Planner)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Agree 100% with this observation. The &quot;Master - Servant&quot; relationship with the Master being whose paying for the service is and has always been wrong. The suggested change would fix this &amp; remove bias plus increase integrity of the system.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Bob Burns (Retired Financial Planner)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 15:59:51 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>