<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Bring in Chilean-style super tender process: Grattan Institute</title>
	<description>The government should get involved in picking default superannuation funds in order to increase competition and bring down fees, a Grattan Institute report has argued.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=39703860</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:22:29 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:22:29 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by A B (Melbourne East Insurance and Financial Planning Services Pty Ltd)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>What a strange place for the Grattan Institute to source a superannuation fee model. Was that the land of the Juntas until recently? Apples with apples should be compared. It should not always be about fees. Industry super always talk up its low fee structure not considering some vanilla retail funds which also have low fee structures.</p>
<p>Many industry superannuation funds do not have anti detriment inclusions Fees created within our superannuation can include necessary commonwealth government compliance.</p>
<p>Keep up the think tanking Grattan Institute.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>A B (Melbourne East Insurance and Financial Planning Services Pty Ltd)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:22:29 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>