<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Low volatility investing exploits low risk anomaly</title>
	<description>The fallacy that taking high investment risks by its nature leads to high returns leads to too many investors taking unnecessary risks, said a major European investment manager.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=38896474</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:26:14 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:26:14 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Denis Carroll (CheckRisk)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Whilst these comments are interesting and true in part, the fact is that risk in asset classes and sub-classes is not static and indeed, changes over time. There is thus an inherent bias and flaw in just labeling assets as high, medium or low risk.</p>
<p>The fundamental questions which should be asked are: where are we now in the investment cycle (ie positional awareness), and am I being adequately rewarded for the risk I am taking in an asset class?</p>
<p>Once these questions are addressed, then the investor is better placed to make more sensible and effective asset allocation decisions.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Denis Carroll (CheckRisk)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:26:14 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>