<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Treasury looks at further FoFA amendments</title>
	<description>Treasury is considering confidential proposals to reverse rules that ban conflicted remuneration arrangements for corporate super specialist advisers, according to Douglas Latto, president of the Corporate Super Specialist Alliance (CSSA).</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=38213643</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:20:55 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:20:55 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Expert Guy (ABC pty Ltd.)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a step back to the dark ages. They want to be paid to advise on choosing a fund that will then pay them am ongoing fee. How is that not a blatant conflict of interest? We have moved on from this, let&#39;s not go back.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Expert Guy (ABC pty Ltd.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:20:55 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>