<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Industry groups self-interest caused FoFA problems</title>
	<description>The overabundance of industry groups lobbying to ensure their own interests was the cause of the problems and complaints around the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation, Connect Financial Service Brokers chief executive Paul Tynan said.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=37637705</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:56:55 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:56:55 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Harold Holt (holt Financial planning)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>A balanced approach was promoted however industry super funds (ISN) hijacked the entire process and we were left with opt in&#39;s and FDS. Nearly every submission was against opt in and in favour of &quot;opt out&quot;. A royal commission needs to be had to examine how the labor government sponsored by the ISN hijacked FoFA.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Harold Holt (holt Financial planning)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:56:55 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Craig Sinclair (wiseadvice)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>We need to kick it back to FSR. Three page SOA - her is the client here is my advice and sign off - it needs to be that simple - no one apart from lawyers ( first ones against the wall in the revolution) like where we are in this industry - the usa have the sec where the SOA&#39;s should be lodged - bad advice ??? sue the adviser via full teeth FOS/FICS tribunal of fellow experienced advisers . NO SMSF funds under $400K. No direct sucker insurance either.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Craig Sinclair (wiseadvice)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:04:49 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>