<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Sinodinos hints at relaxing conflicted remuneration rules</title>
	<description>Assistant Treasurer Arthur Sinodinos has suggested that some forms of remuneration currently regarded as conflicted may be allowed under the government's amendments to the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=36178325</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:51:22 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:51:22 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Paul Herring (PCH Financial)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>It's high time some reason returned to the financial services industry. Opt-in is so dangerous for both advisers and their clients because of human inertia (some businesses have done very well from human inertia).</p>
<p>Ditto for conflicted remuneration. The industry is already over-regulated and the former government seemed intent on adding to the onerousness of it.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Paul Herring (PCH Financial)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:51:22 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Matt Johnson (Nil)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree wholeheartedly Paul Herring. Let conflicts of interest continue to rule financial advisers&#39; remuneration package!</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnson (Nil)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:49:56 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>