<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - ASIC questions SMSF advice in proposed guidance</title>
	<description>The Australian Securities and Investments Commissions (ASIC) has called into question the quality of advice given to self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) investors in proposed guidance it has released today.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=34710229</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:46:43 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:46:43 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Ron . (Advice)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting. Pity won&#39;t apply to all those practitioners not required to be licensed re SMSF&#39;s for nearly 3 years ie: Tax Agents &amp; Accountants. Close the net on this activity that&#39;s been going on for years here (establishment with &#39;no advice&#39;) and will bring some much needed progress to protect consumers.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Ron . (Advice)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:46:43 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>