<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Terminally ill woman questions superannuation early release laws</title>
	<description>A Queensland woman diagnosed with terminal cancer has said she will have to sell her home after she found that she could not access her superannuation.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=33296449</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:41:49 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:41:49 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Di Caldwell-Smith (Diversa)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>What a warped article. I also empathise with anyone in these situations, however there is always another side. These issues start with the doctors involved, who often will not document that a person has less than 12 months to live for fear of claims under PI insurance.<br>
What about other options, Total &amp; Permanent Insurance, possibility of meeting Conditions of Release, and as said above, claims under compassionate grounds.<br>
Super Funds by nature are empathic, and caring of their members. These decisions are not taken lightly, and it is a two way street, with the member working with the Fund.<br>
As to the Federal member, maybe he should do some research on the rules, and how they work, rather than using an opportunity for a press release</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Di Caldwell-Smith (Diversa)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:41:49 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>