<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Next government to reconsider super taxes: Grattan Inst</title>
	<description>Bringing the commonwealth budget into structural surplus will require the next government to be very different to the Rudd-Gillard and Howard governments, and this will inevitably force a review of superannuation taxes, argued the Grattan Institute yesterday.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=33137361</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:23:51 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:23:51 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Bewildered Industry Observer (SMSF Trustee)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>The aim of the Cooper review was to provide recommendations that would in the long term reduce the cost structure of superannuation. Epic Fail. All of the recommendations implemented to date have just added an additional level of complexity (and therefore cost) to the superannuation system.</p>
<p>There clearly needs to be some taxation reform of superannuation benefits and the taxation of superannuation contributions. Lump sum payments should be discouraged and pensions should be encouraged (or perhaps even mandatory). The tax concessions cannot continue at the same level particularly as a larger proportion of the Australian population will be at retirement age with the next decade.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Bewildered Industry Observer (SMSF Trustee)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:23:51 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>