<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Game changer in six months: AMP SMSFs</title>
	<description>AMP Group's self-managed super fund business is now managing more than 9,100 SMSF accounts, more than treble the number it managed in the first half of last year.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=25681806</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:39:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:39:58 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Graham Hand (cuffelinks.com.au)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Something wrong here. How can AMP Group have 7% of SMSFs if they administer only 9,100 accounts.
<p>According to the latest ATO statistics, there were 496,028 SMSFs at end the end of December 2012, being established at over 2,000 a month. So call it 500,000 now.</p>
<p>I make 9,100/500,000 less than 2%, so let's not get too excited. SMSF administration is still predominantly a 'cottage industry' of thousands of accountants.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Graham Hand (cuffelinks.com.au)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:39:58 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Delusional Claims (Bewildered Industry Observer)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lets hope the SMSF Administration maths is a little better than that of the AMP Group publicist
<p>Over the past year AMP Super has announced previously the acquisitions of<br>
Cavendish (5000 funds)<br>
Smart Super (1000 funds)<br>
Multiport (2500)<br>
That leaves SuperIQ &amp; Ascend with 600 funds</p>
<p>And as there are approximately 496,000 SMSFs at Dec12 (as per the ATO statisitical report) the 9100 funds represents less than 2% of the wholesector (not 7% as claimed above).</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Delusional Claims (Bewildered Industry Observer)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:08:54 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by HUbert East (Grosvenor Pirie)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Regarding whether it is 2% or 7% doesn&#39;t matter. 9,100 funds is a hell of a lot!</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>HUbert East (Grosvenor Pirie)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:16:08 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Bruce Phillips (Private)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Wow - did anyone read the AMP report. They paid $20M for Cavendish - for a reported 5000 funds that is about $4000 per fund!!!
<p>Good luck getting a return on that investment</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Phillips (Private)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:56:37 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>