<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Ten-year future vs. 10-minute tick</title>
	<description>All of them provided great entry points for the brave and those looking at the 10-year future and not the 10-minute tick.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=24016043</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:47:16 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:47:16 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by S A (AMP)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi Ben, agree the ten year time frame will work out. However, I work with recent retirees and people approaching retirement. For them the short term is very important as negative cash flows (pension payments) in a falling market early in retirement (when the asset is biggest) are detrimental to a sustainable retirement income plan. Just saying these people are in a very tricky situation.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>S A (AMP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:47:16 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>