<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - ASIC champion hybrid name change</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
Australian Securities & Investments Commission is pushing for the industry to use the label 'capital note' instead of 'hybrid securities', as part of its ongoing focus on misleading and deceptive advertising.
]]></description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=23250522</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:14:06 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:14:06 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Edward Henry (Financial Solutions)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree with ASIC on this one. The term "Hybrid" is misleading and we&#39;ve all seen commentary bagging it (some of it from people not qualified to comment; who&#39;ve simply recycled it). Some so-called "Hybrids" are pure debt and suitable for those unable to access direct corporate unlisted bonds. The latter matter is well past the consideration phase for wrap account providers who should by now be able to access the relevant providers&#39; on-line resources.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Edward Henry (Financial Solutions)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:14:06 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>