<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - ATO stands up for compliant SMSFs on levy use</title>
	<description>ATO assistant commissioner Stuart Forsyth has told an industry event it is unfair compliant SMSFs have to see a portion of their levy go towards catching out those funds which do not operate properly.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=22784977</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:33:32 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:33:32 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Hein Preller (Superannuation Warehouse)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>It is interesting to see the commnent that many Trustees in a SMSF did not have the intention to run a SMSF. One would think when a Trustee is in a Fund, they intend to run a SMSF.
<p>I have a case like this. A trustee set up a Fund with me, sent me all details for him and his wife, we discussed his Fund and now, 6 months later, he does not want to pay my accounting fees. He is of the opinion he did not instruct me. So one of my Funds are in this category.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Hein Preller (Superannuation Warehouse)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:33:32 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>