<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Direct insurance 40% of market by 2021</title>
	<description>Directly sold insurance will comprise 40% of the market within a decade and intermediaries need to be prepared to work with the growth channel rather than see it as a competitor.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=19375288</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:50:48 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:50:48 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Gary C (Adviser)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>It is just amazing to me that professional risk advisers have to jump through so many regulatory hoops and it is becoming more difficult every day.........yet the same regulators/commentators allow/condone the proliferation of "BUYER BEWARE....go online, work it out for yourself, buy it with your toothpaste at a supermarket" substandard insurance offerings, that we as professionals know will disappoint the client .........what is going on ?.
<p>I can see that insurers involved obviously figure it is more profitable to underwrite a limited number of cases at claim time, than all cases initially ....especially when you can add in plenty of non-disclosure issues, pre -existing conditions and dare I say it ...a smidge of "divide and conquer" through outsourced call centres..............but is it good business?</p>
<p>I don't think so....I believe that "direct insurance is false economy because it won't take too many declined claims, before the Media crucifies our industry....AGAIN.....</p>
<p>Sadly, professional risk advisers will also be bagged AGAIN and surprise, surprise...our regulations will tighten further...Not to mention those customers who really thought they had their family covered.</p>
<p>I think direct marketing insurance sales should be banned.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Gary C (Adviser)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:50:48 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Peter Williamson (Sapiens)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Pretty much agree with Dave. The problem with underwriting at claim time, with all the caveats that Dave mentioned is that<br>
(a) many people will buy direct without understanding that they are not actually covered - how many actually read the fine print?<br>
(b) Australians will be increasingly under insured, particularly those that need it most as they will have little or no opportunity of being underwritten.
<p>Direct distribution has to be regulated in the same way as brokers and agents to ensure the insurance products and services are delivered 'fit for purpose'.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Peter Williamson (Sapiens)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:01:17 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>