<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Super fund documents unreadable: Study</title>
	<description>The documents produced by Australia's largest superannuation funds have performed dismally in an analysis of readability, with an average score of 45.6 out of a possible 100.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=179790306</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:23:47 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:23:47 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Jack Wellings (Wellinvest)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Of course, none of them are understandable to Mr, Mrs or Ms Average. Why not? Because all fund documents - especially Product Disclosure documents - have to be COMPLIANT to ensure they make ASIC requirements - particularly to avoid &#39;non-disclosure&#39;.</p>
<p>So you get umpteen pages of long-winded explanations of nausea-inducing and largely irrelevant detail. Well, ASIC, you can&#39;t have it both ways. Even if you think you can.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Jack Wellings (Wellinvest)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:23:47 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>