<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - ASIC takes on NAB for fee-for-no service breaches</title>
	<description>The corporate regulator is fighting tooth and nail to make National Australia Bank pay a hefty penalty for charging customers fees in return for no service.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=179778707</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:15:48 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:15:48 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Paul Forbes (RFS Advice)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Which advisers will pay for through their ASIC fees and, if any penalty is paid, will be sent to directly to consolidated revenue with no offset for the legal costs. I wonder why adviser ASIC fees are so high?</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Paul Forbes (RFS Advice)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:15:48 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>