How could this be in Members best retirement interests - where is the published data - successor fund criteria? Even if it lowers fees and is in the funds own interest it hurts members outcomes. What you are invested in (which investment option option) is far more important to retirement outcomes compared to which fund (MTAA or Tasplan). Should be banned along with the directors who approved it. Hopeless understanding of their role.

Reply to article

For original story, Click Here.