<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - What is holding Aussie robo advisers back?</title>
	<description>Higher base fees, more complex fee structures and fewer investment options could be holding Australian robo advisers back from reaching the scale their American counterparts have, according to new research from Rainmaker.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=140511360</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:14:48 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:14:48 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Steve Robo Adviser (FINANCIAL ADVISER)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>In America, the major firms are actually encouraging personal advisers be added to robo-accounts. If we did away with Opt-In notifications and a lot of the unnecessary red tape cleverly imposed on non-aligned advisers, low income investors could afford to gain access advisers in Australia once more.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Steve Robo Adviser (FINANCIAL ADVISER)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:14:48 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>