<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Flawed assumptions pushing RRR too high</title>
	<description>Superannuation advocates' claims that SG contribution rates need to keep rising to fund retirement income replacement ratios of up to 70% might be based on flawed assumptions.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=12765495</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:45:44 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:45:44 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Geoff Whiddon  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>As those who haven't saved enough for their retirement whether their standard of living could have improved with more money in retirement. What many people forget about working is that your time is occupied for 8-10 hours per day and you are paid for that. In retirement you need to fund that time - be it with travel, dining out, hobbies, etc. It all costs money which you are no longer earning.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Whiddon  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:45:44 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>