<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - DomaCom concludes Federal Court action</title>
	<description>Federal Court proceedings supported by DomaCom have concluded, allowing an SMSF to invest in DomaCom's fund even if a related party is a tenant in the underlying property.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=126986062</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:58:18 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:58:18 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Eagle Rock (Private Enterprise)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Correct. Based on the facts of THAT PARTICULAR CASE!</p>
<p>In any case, the investment was still considered an in house asset of the fund so not really all that useful in practice.</p>
<p>Also, if Aussiegolfa has been ordered to pay fees etc, and Domacom is set to pick these costs up (on Aussiegolfa&#39;s behalf) there may be a contribution cap concern arising for the members of the fund! Another sting in the tail perhaps?</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Eagle Rock (Private Enterprise)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:58:18 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>