<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - ASIC questioned over new powers</title>
	<description>ASIC faced questions over the potential risks in its proposed increase in powers under FOFA during the Parliamentary Joint Committee yesterday in a session where the regulator gave preliminary results to its planning shadow shop survey with "woeful" results for planners.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=12613572</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:08:46 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:08:46 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by max  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>ASIC's shadow shopping exercise clearly a politically contrived agenda driven exercise specifically designed to be available at this point of time.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>max  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:08:46 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Mike  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Who was on the panel?   Were they people with a planning or accounting background?</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Mike  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:42:41 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Alan  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you  want  to  know  what  I  think  about  shadow  shopping?  I'll  tell  you  anyway.......it's  a  shameful,  disgusting  and  sneaky  way  of  attempting  to  find  out  whether  a   group  of  people  are  doing  anything  "wrong".<br>Is  it  done  with  doctors?  Lawyers?  Accountants?  politicians?  bureaucrats?  Anyone  else  in  society?   <br>I  think  you  get  my  drift.<br>This  is  very  different  to  an  audit  which makes  sure  advisers  are  using  the  correct  procedure  and  have  their  paperwork  in  place  as  required  by  the  legislation  and  the  licence  holder.  <br>It  might  work  with  restuarants  but  I  suspect  it  is  hardly  appropriate  for  those  who  offer  a  professional  service  and  advice.<br>People  are  always  free  to  get  a  second  or  third  opinion  or  even  ask  their  advisers  for  alternative  options.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Alan  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:00:21 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Bob 2  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>I would like to see the other side of politics organise a shadow shopping excercise on industry funds for a change</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Bob 2  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:10:49 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>