<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Legal threats loom over poor SMSF advice</title>
	<description>Some financial advisers and accountants that call themselves 'SMSF specialists' are ill-equipped to adequately advise on running a self-managed super fund - making them prime targets for litigation and causing reputational damage to the SMSF sector.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=12360954</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by John  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Technical and legal terms can be dealt with by ASIC.  SMSF's are and have out performed corporate funds.  SMSF's are growing.  Corporate funds seem only to be able to promote their being by underhanded stealth targetting of successful SMSF's in the hope that people will be discouraged from starting SMSF and keep their funds in retarding corporate funds.  Starting a SMSF is easy and cheap and reasonably priced advise can be obtained independently or through arms length associations. One only has to read the free information on the ATO website to understand SMSF's in fact the ATO run seminars to assist.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>John  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>