<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Industry super funds show patchy approach to emergency reserves</title>
	<description>Industry super funds have increased their emergency reserves since the global financial crisis but the uptake has been patchy with some funds having no buffer at all, new research has found.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=12155095</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:29:11 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:29:11 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Tiara  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>More smoke and mirrors:<br>"In our view they (those with inadequate reserves) are exposed as they might find themselves in the position of needing to reduce returns to members in order to meet the cost arising from dealing with an operational risk event."<br>Where exactly does he think the money to build operational reserves will come from to start with?! It will similarly come from a reduction in returns to members - reminiscent of the very frowned upon 'investment smoothing reserves' of days gone by which APRA so opposes.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Tiara  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:29:11 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>