<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - ASIC looks to reshape retail advice</title>
	<description>Client preference for scalable advice rather than a holistic approach has lead the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to propose a replacement regulatory guide.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=12148351</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:45:26 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:45:26 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Trevor  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Corporations Act Sec 945A embodies holistic advice. That is the law.<br>Regulatory Guides are "just and only" guides and not prescriptive law.<br>Therefore Sec 945A needs to be repealed and rewritten so that there is absolutely no misunderstanding as to what constitutes simple, scalable and/or holistic advice and financial product advisers are not put at any unnecessary legal risk.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Trevor  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:45:26 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Adam Williams  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>&nbsp;I think ASIC has already stated that the language in s945A will be amended so that the reasonable basis test can be explicitly satisfied by scaled advice, but RG200 also addresses the issue, as does CP164, that the suitability requirements are scalable. The risk should be minimal for advice consistent with the RGs. Probably worth making a submission on the matter.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Adam Williams  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:49:57 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Frank  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>All advice is scaleable. It's what the adviser determines when meeting the client. In plain English - What is the client asking me to do? or for the compliance people - What are the parameters being set around the advice I am being asked to give. It's called the Scope. All professions use it. Lawyers, Doctors etc.<br>Until you know the scope you don't know what questions to ask because you don't know what the task is.<br>The scope is the foundation from which everything else flows naturally. Of course it may take more than one meeting to determine what the scope is because the client himself may not be aware of what's on offer.<br>Why do we continue to make simple things complex?</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Frank  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:49:59 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Dale  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Well said!</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Dale  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:48:37 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>