<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Retail funds want more super access</title>
	<description>AMP has joined the chorus of retail funds who want the current award system opened to more competition, giving their superannuation funds greater access to default-fund advantage.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=12100555</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:02:51 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:02:51 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Get real  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>AMP is 38th out of 39 funds over 10 years, with a return on its balanced fund of 3.46% versus median of 5.09%. Maybe when they produce a decent return they have grounds to complain. In the meantime keep your head down.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Get real  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:02:51 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Free choice  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>So what is the problem with giving AMP (and anyone else interested) access? Surely they wouuld be no threat if performance/fees are not competetive.</p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Free choice  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:13:24 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>