<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Financial Standard Comments - Small licensees are PI insurance compliant: ASIC</title>
	<description>The majority of small Australian financial services licensees are meeting professional indemnity (PI) insurance obligations, according to an ASIC investigation.</description>
	<link>https://www.financialstandard.com.au/feed/latest?story=102902260</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:40:35 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:40:35 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Financial Standard</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by WAYNE CHARLES (SIS INSURANCE BROKERS PTY LTD)</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>The statement that the majority of small licensees are meeting their PI obligation is farcical given that the vast majority when requesting cover ask for &quot;the lowest premium possible&quot;. When asked what do they want the answer in the majority of cases is &quot;the cheapest&quot;.</p>
<p>It is even becoming very regular that the licensees are asking for quotations on larger and larger excesses so as to reduce the premiums. This does not ensure protection for the consumer.</p>
<p>Recently excesses of $500,000 any one claim was requested by a company with $1 million turnover. What is the regulated formula for complying cover please.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>WAYNE CHARLES (SIS INSURANCE BROKERS PTY LTD)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:40:35 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>